Research the negatives of Charter schools in LAUSD school system Paper

The negatives of Charter schools in LAUSD school system - Research Paper ExampleIt is located in board district 1, local district 3, South Burnside Avenue, at 5100 Wilshire BLVD, in Los Angeles, CA. it serves approximately three hundred students in grade 6-8. Charter schools have brought about criticism in education system oddly in Los Angeles. The race of schools to provide quality education and maintain a position at the masking has increased the support for charter schools in Los Angeles (Jack Buckley 3). The current struggle seen between LAUSD school board and totality over charter schools represents the thirst for quality and top position. The quality of schools in Los Angeles is very low. They do o respond to the educational needs of the Los Angeles community. This observation clearly shows that nighthing has to be done to bring a craved change. Despite the fact, that t it is clear that schools in Los Angeles need radical change, charter schools are not the solve for the required change (Jack Buckley 3). Charter schools have been criticized for not meeting the requirements of the change required to solve the worry of low quality education in Los Angeles. Critics state that charter schools provide the best in terms of educational performance but still ignore important aspects of the hostelry. The problem about charter schools started at the same time that charter schools began (Whitney 194). ... For instance, in a report compiled by UCLA civil rights project in 2003, Gary Orfield noted that people had an early concern with regard to the ability of charter schools to represent the minority (Whitney 95). They were come to that charter schools would admit white students as they would escape diverse public schools. Others noted that charter schools would agree public schools further to offer poor education to those who would not afford to pay for charter schools. In addition, this would result to discrimination of students based on the schools they occupy and consequently their social class in society (Whitney 195). Other people criticized charter schools stating that they are more caper oriented than education oriented because they doctor their funding from a variety of sources that includes private investment. Private firms are allowed to fund Charter schools and can blend profits when these schools perform. The schools are managed for profit. However, when charter schools fail to realize its target private investors leave for other business viable places. This means that the schools are closed thereby depriving students a right to continuous education (Jack Buckley 43). Therefore, some argued that the schools would promote profit-making ideals as opposed to educating children. Others argued that the profit would assist those schools achieve success. The government as well as private investors fund charter schools. They are funded through the federal categorical funding. They are opposed by teacher unions, antiracial grou ps and activists, private researchers and parents and students who favor public school system(Jack Buckley 43). According to Grading the Chartering Organizations, 2003, most states had a hardly a(prenominal) resources for oversight