The converseing of eyewitness is a very sensitive process that adopt to be carried out with c ar and logic if it is to get through in its aims. However, it has been shown that the reposition is fallible and can fail when it comes to refunding stored training in that it recalls false information about events that didnt really happen. This hence poses a problem when eyewitnesses are interviewed as they can a lot recall information that is false and so delay the investigation. bartlett adduce that memories are reconstructions in accordance with a system and that they are not videos. Loftus also made similar findings to this; he utter that the retention is influenced by the questions asked as memories are reconstructions. This therefore shows that in order to improve the random nature of interviews the above mental principles need to be applied. In light of this, Tulving and Thompson (1973) investigated the encryption specificity principle. They fix that due to memori es being encoded, stored and the retrieved it is easier to retrieve a reposition when you are in the same ruttish or visible state as when you encoded it.
Therefore, in a cognitive interview enquire the interviewee to re ?create mentally the physical and emotional dorsumground of the incident may jog their memory and so they testament be able to give a more finished description of what happened. Police may also take them hindquarters to the scene of the crime and try and reconstruct the incident in a Crimewatch style to see if this sets off any memory triggers. Loftus and Collins (1975) also came up wit h a model that by chance applied to intervi! ewing techniques. The spreading activation model shows that concepts in the colossal term memory are linked semantically i.e. by means of semantic nets. Therefore to improve the interviewing techniques... If you motive to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment