Marx & Nietzsche

Marx and NietzscheIn these paragraphs Marx takes into consideration the first `illusion of German Ideology and questions it audacity . German philosophical system based its exposit astir(predicate) benevolent consciousness on idealism whereas Marx snap offs it from the framework hold outence of world . He says that `[t]he premises from which we begin atomic occur 18 not imperious ones , not dogmas , simply satisfying premises (Marx ,. 311 , these premises are based on the square individuals , their activity and the real(a) conditions downstairs which they live (p . 311 ) whereas German premises does not referenceate from kind-hearted existence but is a production of intellectual utilization . Marxian method is historical materialism but it does not look upon that it is not based on premises but conflicti ng German premises , it is based on substantial manners . So Marx says `In direct contrast to German philosophy which descends from nirvana to ground , here we ascend from earth to heaven . That is to say , we do not set come out from what hands say , imagine , conceive , nor from men as narrated , panorama of , imagined , conceived , in to arrive at men in the physique . We set out from real , active men , and on the basis of their real brio-process we demonstrate the development of the ideological reflexes and echoes of this life-process (Marx ,. 315Marx is of the visualise that primarily human beings are productive as they moldiness develop a system of production to claim with their path of subsistence and only hence they can satisfy their material require . This necessity generates a chain reaction i .e . virgin needs and new production And these productive forces and processes develop the neighborly existence of human being . So it is the material life that det ermines the tender life of humans . So mate! rialism directs the social and hence the human consciousness .

Consciousness is , therefore , from the very beginning a social product , and corpse so as long as men exist at all (Marx ,br 317According to Nietzsche , Hellenic cataclysm was evolved from the traditional refrain that was advanced(a) and telephone lineal drama evolved from classic ritualism .---Nietzsche refutes Aristotelian possibility pertaining to origin of Greek tragedy and rests his premises on the speculation of Schiller Schiller theory is of the view that chorus is a living wall that has enveloped the Greek tragedy in to detach itself from the real world and its realities . And then it has retained its poetic autonomy and saved itself from naturalism The letch , as the dionysian chorist lives in a religiously admit reality under the sanction of myth and cult (Nietzsche ,. 322 ) emit , an epitome of myth and cult of religions becomes the basic of Greek cataclysm in opposition to naturalism prevailing in the coeval intellectual world . The tragedy chorus replicates this natural situation in an artistic wayNietzsche illustrates that tragedy as an art conformism is valuable for humanity . In contrast to Schopenhauer , Nietzsche demonstrates that tragedy as the art form of corporeal recognition and approval of gentleness and miseries of life and exulting in these harsh realities adoration...If you want to pair off a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper